This is pathetic!

Paul Offit knows better than to have anything to do with the “other side” of the vaccine argument, because he knows that there’s only one side! Pardon my language, but THERE ARE NOT [beep!]ING TWO SIDES, TAYLOR, YOU STUPID BITCH!!

Paul was right to pull out of the interview. He was lied to. As he said (and Taylor screenshotted it) on Facebook;

Liz, I was specifically told that we would not debate vaccine safety issues and wasn’t told who the other guest would be. When I found out, I called the producer this morning. He told me that it was important to present both sides of the vaccine debate. I asked him if he thought that there were two sides to the issue of whether vaccines caused autism or contained harmful toxins. He said that that was for the listener to figure out, after hearing both sides. So I told him I was out and that he should be ashamed of himself for unnecessarily scaring parents. He told me that Mike Gallagher always stays in the middle of issues. I asked him where Gallagher stood on issues like the existence of gravity. Was he in the middle of that one? Painful.

And Taylor has the gall to call Paul a coward after that rightful broadside? If Paul went before a court under oath he would be magnificent, and show Taylor and her supporters just how LITTLE they understood about vaccines. I know more about vaccines than Taylor does and I’m not even a qualified expert! I’m simply a person who has something that Taylor doesn’t have much of – common sense.

There is only one side to the vaccines debate. It prevents disease and does nothing else when used correctly. There are no toxins in vaccines as they are compounds that make the individual parts irrelevant, just like sodium and chlorine are irrelevant when dealing with salt.

It’s at times like this that I wish the USA didn’t have that wretched First Amendment, because that accusation of being a liar is libel for one very simple reason. It’s a false statement.

Here’s a true statement. Ginger Taylor is a liar.

The latest entry from Taylor would be of interest – but for one problem.

She promotes a debate on the CBS affiliated TV station in Portland, Maine as “balanced”, figuring both sides were looked after. But it’s run by Tea Party central – Town Hall dot com! The Tea Party has a history of conspiracy BS and opening up the whole box and dice as though it all works when it bloody well doesn’t! They will always hide the real science because it goes against their religious agenda.

A visit to Cassandra Grantham’s business Facebook page makes it clear that the TV station had sold out for ratings. One comment said plenty;

Parents need to get their medical advice from their trusted physician and not TV’s talking heads.

Especially when the three doctors on the panel (Taylor was the fourth person) consisted of only one who sort of belonged there (Dr Mills) and even then she has a high profile sacking on her resume. Meryl Nass is a quack upon a brief Dogpile search and Dr Flanigan is a neurologist and has no business discussing vaccines!

Jackie Farrell, the health editor of the Bangor Daily News (the paper of the third largest city in Maine) made the point that most of the audience were vaccine sceptics – which again is consistent with the bias mentioned. The balance came online where the pro vaxxers made their voice heard – the only way that would have been noticed given that supporters were locked out of it!

This was a case of showing off by Taylor, but Jackie observed that in the end the panel helped no one. And that is not a bad thing – that is a good thing!

Oh for goodness sakes!

I don’t know what happened but the email I said I sent in my last entry has disappeared so now I’m not sure if I sent it or not. Nevertheless I’m delighted to say that Cassandra reacted to Taylor’s email telling her “I will not respond to future emails on this subject.” She added a demand that Taylor remove her picture from her blog (as well as Facebook and anywhere else). On the blog, that demand has been totally ignored – in fact Taylor claimed fair use on the grounds of this “lie” being newsworthy and therefore in the public interest! Your lies are NOT in the public interest, you stupid witch! Taylor has made complaints to a plethora or other authorities and of course she got nowhere – and rightly so. Cassandra did NOT lie!

Taylor is now going a step further with this libel, trying to insert legislation in Maine to punish liars within the state’s health sector. This will have no effect on Cassandra or Maine Health (or anyone else who states that Vaccines don’t cause Autism) because they are not lying. Vaccines don’t cause Autism. In fact saying they do is lying so in fact if Taylor can get herself into some sort of medical position SHE would end up on the wrong end of this legislation!

Looking at the legislation though there is no way this will go through. It’s too biased against vaccines and doesn’t provide for at best a balanced viewpoint. It’s all about the negatives of vaccines (so-called). Section F claims an ability to investigate vaccine injury claims, which interferes with the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims in my opinion as that is their job at present. Remembering of course that I think that stupid court shouldn’t be there because it protects negligent administrators of vaccines.

All factors of this legislation that have any usefulness should already be covered for in other health legislation regarding vaccines in general. Beth O’Connor (who put this piece of junk before the House) should be voted out next time she’s up for election. I am unable to find anything concrete about that at this point except that she is a Republican.

This is a waste of the Maine Parliament’s time and money and Taylor should be called to a count for it. The sooner her precious list of studies is bunked as proof of any connection between vaccines and Autism the better!

This is pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. I know for a fact that studies have been done – one here in Australia that was celebrated by the Mamamia website. Vaccines are not linked to Autism!

And yet when the head honcho of MaineHealth, Cassandra Grantham makes the point – Taylor turns around and accuses her of lying! I know that Taylor is screeching for a vaccinated v unvaccinated study, and I think that’s how she’s translating this. No study along those lines, and therefore any other study is bunk automatically. She’s not a professional so how the heck does she know? Remember that this fool is retaining reports in her collection that are either not about vaccines or not about Autism. Even when told that!

Nevertheless, I’ve emailed Cassandra and this is what I said after linked the entry on Taylor’s blog;

I wanted to bring to your attention this publicly available statement, because I believe you are the victim of serious libel here by Ginger Taylor. I think we both know that she is NOT the mother of a vaccine injured child – she is the mother of an Autistic child. Not the same thing. I have seen some of the new studies that have been released this year – yes even in Australia – and Ginger’s sheer ignorance of them is bordering on obsessive.

It’s up to you if you want to sue her or not. I wouldn’t be replying to the letter she has sent, or if you do it should be a legal warning about libel and links to some of the studies such as;
http://www.mamamia.com.au/news/study-proves-no-link-autism-and-vaccines/
http://sydney.edu.au/news/84.html?newsstoryid=13491
(Probably the same study)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X14006367
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/01/research-finds-vaccine-reactions-rare-no-autism_n_5549255.html

I’m trying to get Ginger’s massive list of studies that claim to contradict the above studies examined and bunked here in Australia – but it’s a hard road.

You’re doing a very important job, and the last thing you need is to have that black widow Ginger Taylor on your back.

Taylor is calling on Cassandra to retract her statement. I say don’t. Cassandra is in the right. Taylor is out of line and has no right making such a demand, especially when she is accusing Cassandra of being a liar.

I call on Taylor to retract her statement, and start the review of her stack of studies. Before I beat her to it and make sure that each and every one of them is proven to be bunk by science, and thrown in the bin where it belongs.

Vaccines do not cause Autism. Autism is genetic at the root, and that’s a fact.

This entry appeared while I was in Donald campaigning.

Taylor, you are a stupid bitch! Mind you, it doesn’t help that the legal fraternity in the US have caused those ingredient inserts to be included in vaccines. Paul Offit knows this and that means ignoring the inserts is absolutely the right advice. It’s like I’ve always said – if we’re going to go down that way, let’s attack salt because there’s chlorine in it! Hydrogen is included in water! And a few harmless acids (vinegar is an acid as an example). What – shouldn’t we eat anything now?

Dr Offit is right. The inserts are the bane of his existence, and everyone else’s because idiots are taking said inserts and creating a panic. That’s BS and it has to stop. Vaccines are compounds and just like salt and water the ingredients do not matter – at all.

If I get into Parliament I think I’ll chase up the root cause of this legal instruction regarding inserts – if anything to make sure the same thing doesn’t happen here. It shouldn’t, what with commercial confidentiality in force. If I have time I might bring this to the attention of my local member of Federal Parliament.

The entry I’m responding to here turned up while I was in Maryborough, and boy Ginger you really don’t get it!

How dare you, Taylor! No one can re-define Autism! It is what it is – genetic in origin and susceptible to sensory overload. “Recovery” insinuates a cure when you speak of “recovery from Autism”, which is impossible. Now if you say “recovery from sensory overload” (which is what it actually is) then you won’t get any where near as many complaints!

Autistics will always have impaired communication. It can improve but there will always be holes in it. The same applies to impaired social interaction and stereotyped behaviours. They all stay in a true Autistic. It’s the gravity that changes. For Taylor to claim that behaviours disappear completely in true Autistics shows that she is still a long way from understanding the condition. I’m willing to bet she has some of the behaviours herself – much like Best who I believe is Autistic. Taylor might not have enough of the behaviours for a diagnosis, but that’s the point she’s missing! You can’t be cured of those behaviours – they are a part of you! You can improve them, but you can’t cure them! Anyone who says they have is lying.

So it’s Taylor who is doing the re-defining – not those who are complaining about the use of the word “Recovery” when talking about Autism. Change the subject to sensory overload and then I’ll listen.

This is another of those occasions where I don’t have an issue with supporting Ginger.

Whilst I have no time for the Thinking Mom’s Revolution, it’s founder Melanie Baldwin is having a third battle with cancer. She has a low functioning Autistic to care for and just for once Ginger is doing the right thing and pleading for help for Melanie. This goes to the fact that there is no way Melanie could fight cancer AND look after a low functioning Autistic.

https://www.giveforward.com/fundraiser/x4v5/melanie-hamilton-aka-booty-kicker-thinking-moms-revolution?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium
=fb_share_send&utm_campaign=dashboard_supporters&og_action=hug&t=3

The moment I read this entry, I headed for the Portland Press Herald link intending to comment, but it wants a Facebook login so I didn’t bother. It didn’t matter as the voice of reason Dorit Reiss was onto it along with a few other Facebook names I’ve seen on my side in this matter.

This is what I intended to say;

I am disappointed in the Portland Press Herald for publishing this. The original article was absolutely right, and Ginger Taylor has demonstrated most ably with this reply that she isn’t listening to reason. She isn’t the only one as some of the comments here are indicating. Vaccines are not the problem. They are safe when used correctly. Vaccine injuries only occur when something else happens that wasn’t taken into account. People blaming vaccines and vaccines only are not helping the matter – at all. There are no dangers from them. There is a danger in ignorance, and in particular the lack of belief in disease prevention – especially as it relates to our senior citizens and to our children. If you don’t vaccinate you are a poor parent. If a vaccine injury does occur, find out the reason from those who understand and never ever guess out of some sort of family instinct. 9,999 times out of 10,000 that instinct is 100 percent wrong.

Taylor is anti vaccine whether she likes it or not, because of the methods she uses to fight. She targets the vaccines. She refuses to exonerate vaccines from any issues and place all of the blame on the delivery system. After all, she has 70 odd reports linked on her blog supposedly supporting the idea that vaccines may cause Autism. And she even said;

The effectiveness of vaccines is overstated, safety claims made are overstated and parents no longer get accurate risk information.

Only an anti-vaxxer would say something like that, and the Herald knew it.

The only thing she said that was right was that Jenny McDumbell and Andrew Wakefield are no longer factors. Ginger Taylor and her pathetic Canary Party are a factor. So are other idiots who just will not get it. Vaccines do not cause Autism, and as I type this I noticed that Taylor now claims the number of reports are over 80. I’ll have to get back to that and update the list for my local member of Australian Parliament when I have the time.

This entry appeared on Taylor’s blog on July 24, the day before I was transferred from Royal Adelaide Hospital to Ballarat Base Hospital.

Taylor has explained her three month absence from blogging as concentrating on media work and something called Health Choice. But she came back with a swipe at a bunch of well educated high school students who put together what appears to be an excellent documentary supporting vaccines. And Taylor has the nerve to attack for not being qualified to talk about it, when she herself is just as unqualified??

I’ve already shown on this blog that Taylor’s education is lacking. She only listens to what she wants to hear. She only reads what she wants to read. And she makes her own interpretations of information along these lines. I can’t wait to finally get Peter Dutton (the Australian Health Minister) off his arse and getting Taylor’s reports properly reviewed and corrected appropriately. Those reports are either being misinterpreted (there are some that either have nothing to do with Autism or have nothing to do with vaccines) or they are junk science. Of course Taylor probably won’t listen, but she’s not important in that regard. It’s the parents who still have the open minds (and I would hope that takes in the majority of vaccine opponents) who need to listen, and if they do Taylor and everyone else who won’t listen will lose their precious support base.

There’s another thing that bothers me. Why would the Maine Health Department offer Taylor CME credits? She’s not a medical professional! CME in the US stands for “Continuing Medical Education”. If I had time I would email them and inform them that Taylor is a con woman. Mind you, it’s just possible that they offered that to try and re-educate her. Waste of time (as her inflammatory bash on Johns Hopkins shows!).

But I do agree with one thing. There is some recognition of the delivery system having problems. Even Taylor seems to be willing to admit that. The start of the way back there is to shut down the Vaccine Court and start weeding out the quacks who are doing the wrong thing – the doctor who gave Hannah Poling nine vaccines on the one visit should be targeted for a start!

Finally, whilst the comparison between anti vaxxers and the Taliban could be valid I wouldn’t be using it in such a general way.

As a general rule, conscription is undemocratic. But not when it comes to vaccinating your children.

However, Taylor has decided to take a leaf out of the book of another person in response to what Taylor and her fellow idiots call a “Hate Debate”. This stems from a new tactic by those who support vaccines near the top – people like Paul Offit – whereby they are putting mother against mother to try and force the decision on vaccinations. “Mommy Wars”, as Taylor’s source put it.

Taylor sees this as an attempt to prevent mothers from using their instincts to protect their children. You stupid hypocrite! If you had all the instincts intact with all the logic that goes with it, you’d know that the first instinct is to protect your child from preventable diseases! Ergo, you bloody well vaccinate! Otherwise, you are NOT protecting your child whether you like it or not!

For instance, this source of Taylor’s claims that the diseases never left. They were reducing you lying hag! Now because of you idiotic failures for mothers, the prevalence is going back up again! Whether you like it or not, Taylor, you are a part of the “Mommy Wars”. Your blog is proof of that. It’s not evil to take children away from parents who refuse to vaccinate. It’s the right thing to do. Refusing to vaccinate without a valid medically verified reason IS evil! It’s outright child neglect!

By even putting up this entry – you are taking part in the “Mommy Wars”. And you will lose because you don’t have the best interests of your children at heart. Your lack of education in vaccines is proof of that. I know the full story. I know the general answers. Because I pay attention and I am not stricken with panic and paranoia like Ginger Taylor is.